Build Your Own Clone Message Board

It is currently Thu Apr 25, 2024 6:57 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Apr 24, 2021 12:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:28 am
Posts: 16
Hello,

I've checked everything a few times over but don't see anything obviously wrong so far with my work. I get a fine clean signal, leds all work and pulse in what I assume is a correct fashion. Footswitches work. Tried two different power sources.

If I turn the blend knob all the way to wet, all I hear is a very faint and fizzy effected signal. Adding a tad bit of dry signal basically just gives me dry only, since the wet signal is so faint. At first I thought there was no wet signal at all, but now I can actually discern a very faint and fizzy wet signal when the dry is cut out at full clockwise turn of the blend pot.

Here are pictures of the top and bottom of the board so far:

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 25, 2021 4:16 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 5:14 pm
Posts: 8659
Location: Truckee, CA
Try removing and reinstall the PT2399 chips from their sockets (reseating them). Verify there is 5 volts DC on pin 1 of each PT2399, and try swapping their positions.

If you have any pedals with known good PT2399s, swap them out.

_________________
MasterDelayer/Reverbrador/Ampaholic/TopJacker


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:28 am
Posts: 16
Interesting. I have 5v (4.8 on my mm to be precise) on each PT2399 IC. I switched them around and had wet signal once, so I put it back in the case and retried...no signal. Took it out of the case again...no signal but the faint fizzy original. I think I'm going to order a couple replacement PT2399s just to try that out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:36 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:39 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Richland, WA
itsalljustaride wrote:
Interesting. I have 5v (4.8 on my mm to be precise) on each PT2399 IC. I switched them around and had wet signal once, so I put it back in the case and retried...no signal. Took it out of the case again...no signal but the faint fizzy original. I think I'm going to order a couple replacement PT2399s just to try that out.


Intermittent problems like that usually suggest faulty solder joints/connections.

_________________
*patience is a virtue*

Please do not PM me. email is prefered. keith@buildyourownclone.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2021 9:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:28 am
Posts: 16
So I do notice something of interest. When I touch two of the 4.7uf Aluminum Electrolytic capacitors, I get a buzzing sound like if you touch the end of the input jack. Could these components be bad or inserted wrong? None of the other ones do this.


Attachments:
Screen Shot 2021-04-27 at 10.56.01 AM.png
Screen Shot 2021-04-27 at 10.56.01 AM.png [ 791.46 KiB | Viewed 4849 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2021 9:59 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:39 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Richland, WA
Remove the two PT2399 chips. Insert jumper wires between pins 14 and 15 of each socket. Does the blend knob now have "wet" signal? The wet signal will now have no delay or modulation. It should have a small amount of the high frequencies filtered out.

_________________
*patience is a virtue*

Please do not PM me. email is prefered. keith@buildyourownclone.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2021 11:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:28 am
Posts: 16
Only very weak non-effected signal with the jumpers in.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 28, 2021 11:00 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:39 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Richland, WA
itsalljustaride wrote:
Only very weak non-effected signal with the jumpers in.


Then the problem probably isn't with the PT2399 chips. Try removing the 571 from its socket and jumpering pins 11 and 7. What does the wet signal sound like now?

_________________
*patience is a virtue*

Please do not PM me. email is prefered. keith@buildyourownclone.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2021 10:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:28 am
Posts: 16
Thanks much. Doing that gives me wet and dry signals that are almost identical. No effect/modulation.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2021 10:47 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:39 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Richland, WA
Now try jumpering 10 and 11 together and 2 and 6 together on the 571 socket. Make sure the PT2399 chips are installed.

_________________
*patience is a virtue*

Please do not PM me. email is prefered. keith@buildyourownclone.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2021 2:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:28 am
Posts: 16
10 & 11: Very faint dry signal
2 & 6: Very faint dry signal, plus oscillating static that appears to maybe coincide with the top-right LED pulsing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2021 2:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:28 am
Posts: 16
Jumpering 10/11 and 2/6 at the same time gives weak dry signal with the fizzy/static effected delay signal mixed in.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 9:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:28 am
Posts: 16
Thanks for all your help btw. I just wired up an audio probe. Are there some specific spots I should try probing to see where the signal chain is breaking down?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 11:02 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:39 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Richland, WA
Based on the signal bypassing you just did, we can assume that the problem is somewhere between the send and return of the 571 compander chip, and possibly including the 571 itself. If you have a signal tester, that's a huge help. Put all the chips in their respective sockets and test in this sequence:

1. Pin 10 of 571
2. Pin 11 of 571
3. Pin 16 of IC3 PT2399
4. Pin 14 of IC3 PT2399
5. Pin 16 of IC4 PT2399
6. Pin 14 of IC4 PT2399
7. Pin 2 of 571
8. Pin 6 of 571

_________________
*patience is a virtue*

Please do not PM me. email is prefered. keith@buildyourownclone.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 06, 2021 10:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:28 am
Posts: 16
HYG. I labelled the PT2399s based on orientation since I couldn't discern which one was the IC3 and which was IC4

1. Pin 10 of 571 -- dry signal, good volume
2. Pin 11 of 571 -- dry signal, slightly weaker vol/thinner tone
3. Pin 16 of IC3 (horizontal) PT2399 -- no signal
4. Pin 14 of IC3 (horizontal) PT2399 -- effected delay signal
5. Pin 16 of IC4 (vertical) PT2399 -- very faint delayed signal
6. Pin 14 of IC4 (vertical) PT2399 -- slightly louder but still faint distorted delayed signal
7. Pin 2 of 571 -- fizzy delayed signal
8. Pin 6 of 571 -- very weak fizzy delayed signal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 06, 2021 2:41 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:39 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Richland, WA
Would you say the signal coming out of IC3 at pin 14 is a good delay signal? Good signal level? Not distorted?

_________________
*patience is a virtue*

Please do not PM me. email is prefered. keith@buildyourownclone.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 07, 2021 8:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:28 am
Posts: 16
Yes, good delay/reverb effected signal on pin 14.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 07, 2021 11:16 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:39 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Richland, WA
itsalljustaride wrote:
Yes, good delay/reverb effected signal on pin 14.


Swap the chip that you have in the IC4 socket for the chip that you have in the IC3 socket. Is the sound coming out of IC3/pin14 still good?

_________________
*patience is a virtue*

Please do not PM me. email is prefered. keith@buildyourownclone.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 07, 2021 11:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:28 am
Posts: 16
Yup! Still good.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2021 11:23 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:39 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Richland, WA
Hmmm....well that means both of your PT2399 chips are good, which is disappointing because that means we don't know what your problem is yet. Please take voltage readings of the IC3 and 4. Please take readings first with the chips out of their sockets and then with the chips in their sockets.

_________________
*patience is a virtue*

Please do not PM me. email is prefered. keith@buildyourownclone.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2021 1:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:28 am
Posts: 16
Measuring at pins 1&4 on the PT2399s I get 005 on both. Measuring at pins 4&13 on the 571 I get 009.

I also went ahead and ordered two new PT2399s and a new 571, and I get same results with the new ICs, so I think you're right that the ICs themselves are fine.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 14, 2021 11:24 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:39 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Richland, WA
itsalljustaride wrote:
Measuring at pins 1&4 on the PT2399s I get 005 on both. Measuring at pins 4&13 on the 571 I get 009.

I also went ahead and ordered two new PT2399s and a new 571, and I get same results with the new ICs, so I think you're right that the ICs themselves are fine.


Mmmm....I don't think you're taking those voltage readings correctly. Also, I need to see the voltage readings for all of the pins, 1 through 16 of both the PT2399 chips. I need to see readings with the chips in their sockets and I need a set of readings of the empty sockets. I'm not really concerned with the 571 at this time, so you don't need to post those readings.


Please let me know if you need assistance with how to use a multimeter. If you do, please let us know the make/model of your meter.

_________________
*patience is a virtue*

Please do not PM me. email is prefered. keith@buildyourownclone.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2021 8:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:28 am
Posts: 16
Here's the multimeter I'm working with.


Attachments:
20210516_104754.jpg
20210516_104754.jpg [ 145.71 KiB | Viewed 4282 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2021 12:58 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 1:24 pm
Posts: 16224
Location: Albany, NY
Set the DC voltage range to 20. Leaving it on 1000 doesn't give you enough sensitivity to see fractional voltages.

_________________
“My favorite programming language is SOLDER” - Bob Pease (RIP)

My Website * My Musical Gear * My DIY Pedals: Pg.1 - Pg.2


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2021 1:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:28 am
Posts: 16
Readings with Chips Inserted

IC3 (horizontal) PT2399

1 - 5.00 9 - 2.50
2 - 2.49 10 - 2.50
3 - 0.00 11 - 2.50
4 - 0.00 12 - 2.50
5 - 2.84 13 - 2.50
6 - 2.50 14 - 2.50
7 - 0.69 15 - 2.50
8 - 0.79 16 - 2.50

IC4 (vertical) PT2399

1 - 5.00 9 - 2.50
2 - 2.49 10 - 2.50
3 - 0.00 11 - 2.50
4 - 0.00 12 - 2.50
5 - 2.89 13 - 2.50
6 - 2.50 14 - 2.50
7 - 0.25 15 - 2.50
8 - 0.69 16 - 2.50

Readings with Chips Removed

IC3 (horizontal) PT2399

1 - 5.00 9 - 0.00
2 - 0.06 10 - 0.00
3 - 0.00 11 - 0.00
4 - 0.00 12 - 0.00
5 - 0.00 13 - 0.00
6 - 0.00 14 - 0.00
7 - 0.00 15 - 0.00
8 - 0.00 16 - 0.00

IC4 (vertical) PT2399

1 - 5.00 9 - 0.00
2 - 0.09 10 - 0.00
3 - 0.00 11 - 0.09 <-- These three would start around 0.30 and then level off at 0.08-10
4 - 0.00 12 - 0.09 <--
5 - 0.00 13 - 0.10 <--
6 - 0.00 14 - 0.00
7 - 0.00 15 - 0.00
8 - 0.00 16 - 0.00


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group